Keyword match
See whether the words on your resume actually reflect the language and requirements used in the posting you want.
ATS Resume Checker
Check how your resume aligns with a real job description, identify missing keywords and weak sections, and get a clearer path to improving match quality before you export.
Sample report metrics
Strong alignment overall, but a few important role phrases are still missing.
Most high-value terms are present, but some are too vague or buried in weak bullets.
The structure is clean, but recent experience needs stronger evidence and sharper wording.
Add the exact language for stakeholder reporting, process optimization, and cross-functional delivery where it fits your actual experience.
Improve the summary, strengthen the latest bullets with outcomes, and mirror job-description terminology more naturally.
Review what is weakening the draft, how each issue affects role alignment, and which improvements deserve attention first.
See whether the words on your resume actually reflect the language and requirements used in the posting you want.
Understand whether your summary, skills, or recent experience are too thin to support the role strongly enough.
Review whether the draft reads like a targeted application instead of a generic career document.
Review role language, recent experience, section strength, and improvement priorities after you have a usable draft.
Highlight terms or role-specific phrases that are absent, underused, or too weakly expressed in the current draft.
Surface experience lines that sound generic, lack outcomes, or do not pull enough weight for the target role.
Fix the highest-leverage problems first so you do not waste time polishing low-impact areas.
If the opening lines still sound broad or generic, the entire resume feels less aligned even when the keywords are technically present.
The most recent role usually carries the most weight. Stronger outcomes there improve both ATS language and recruiter confidence.
Formatting and downloads matter, but only after the content is strong enough to justify sending the application as-is.
A useful ATS review does more than produce a score. It shows how to strengthen the draft before you submit it.
Many resumes look acceptable until they are compared against the exact role language. ATS review exposes where the draft is still too broad.
A decent skills section cannot compensate for a vague summary or underpowered recent experience. The checker makes that easier to see.
Use the report to move directly into the most relevant edit instead of stopping at a generic score.
Use the report to revise the resume, compare relevant examples, prepare a cover letter, or review export options.
Return to Resume Builder with a clearer editing goal when the report identifies weak or incomplete content.
Go To Resume BuilderIf the problem is positioning, examples by job title are often the fastest way to understand what strong framing looks like.
Browse ExamplesIf the resume is close to ready, the next useful step may be generating the matching cover letter for the same role.
Open Cover LettersCompare plan limits and export access when the draft is ready and you need PDF or DOCX downloads.
View PricingCommon questions about ATS scores and resume optimization.
No. It improves alignment and readiness, but it does not replace experience quality, role fit, or market conditions.
No. Keyword stuffing is weaker than improving the summary, bullet specificity, and natural role language together.
It can if done badly. The goal here is better match quality without making the resume robotic or overloaded.
Usually the summary, the most recent experience bullets, and the missing high-value role terms that belong in the draft.
Check the score, review the findings, improve the draft, and export only when the content is ready.